Thursday, November 5, 2009

[Avid-L2] Expert Decompose based upon resolution, was: Re: MC 4 upgrades

You had to use belt and suspenders analogy? Last suit I bought the seamstress suggested suspenders, not for fashion's sake, but because my belt didn't accommodate my editor gut as well as suspenders. Just like storage needs my belt needs have grown with time. ;-(

--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, David Dawkins <dawk2@...> wrote:
>
> My preference (SANs Unity to throw a Canadian pun in) has always been
> separate drives for on-line and off-line media. Removing either
> combination of drives from the system guarantees that you can go always
> go back and make changes and then go forward and capture any additional
> media needed at the on-line res. No muss, no fuss, no confusion. One set
> of drives is your suspenders the other is your belt. Use one or the
> other, never both at the same time.
>
> DD
>
> johnrobmoore wrote:
> >
> >
> > I've been burned too many times having access to offline and online
> > media at the same time. The Avid occasionally burps and decides to
> > relink on it's own for whatever reason and guess what. It grabs the
> > first tape and time code that matches, which may or may not be your
> > online resolution. In fact I lost a show when this happened and I
> > didn't catch it, nor did anyone else, before air. I prefer to have a
> > video mix down for reference then there is no chance of cross
> > pollination of media. I know different work environments lend
> > themselves to different flows but once bitten twice shy. I take the
> > time to consolidate a project to it's own volume/workspace for online.
> > That plus a common graphics elements workspace keeps things managable
> > and easy to archive.
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > Dave Hogan <mactvman@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree that relinking sometimes seems like more art than science.
> > However, it is not always an option to throw away all your offline
> > media before doing online. Other editing may need to occur, and
> > changes happen, so I try to keep my low rez media around till the
> > project airs or releases.
> > >
> > > By relinking to a new sequence, or copying your sequence before
> > re-linking, you can preserve all your materials in the original
> > sequence, and if something off the wall happens, you can always gang
> > the original and re-linked sequences together to fix the possible
> > issues. Keeping a low rez copy of my edit handy also gives me
> > something to check against for reference, or the occasional sanity check.
> > >
> > > My approach may be influenced by the fact that most of my work these
> > days is promos and short form segments. I could see where it might be
> > scary to relink an entire show, and then have to check every
> > segment/act for accuracy. But that pretty much has to happen at some
> > point either way.
> > >
> > > Reel number issues can be dealt with in a relinking work flow, and
> > since I have been using a relink based workflow for a few years now, I
> > have gotten comfortable with it, and find it faster and more
> > beneficial in the long run.
> > >
> > > I guess the great thing about the AVID NLEs is the depth of the
> > product, and the fact that there are countless ways to approach and
> > solve problems in different ways.
> > >
> > > I wanted to share my approach on this list, because I have been
> > surprised at how many editors don't know about this workflow, which I
> > find faster, more efficient, and more flexible.
> > >
> > > I am curious, when you select the lower rez reference clips in your
> > sequence bin, do you delete the video for those clips?
> > >
> > > If you unlink the reference clips, then it could be a more
> > controlled way to do the same thing as using the relink tool, but
> > specifying just the sources you wanted to take offline. I will have to
> > try this on my next online and see how it works out.
> > >
> > > (on a side note, I miss early Netscape and the hotkey to the fishcam...)
> > >
> > > Dave Hogan
> > > Burbank, CA
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: johnrobmoore <bigfish@>
> > > To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Wed, November 4, 2009 12:01:39 PM
> > > Subject: [Avid-L2] Expert Decompose based upon resolution, was: Re:
> > MC 4 upgrades
> > >
> > >
> > > Interesting approach but I find it faster to show ref clips and sort
> > by res then dump the undesired media then decompose. Relinking is
> > prone to subtle issues in this new file based work flows. Relinking is
> > both science and a bit of art. I've found that with adoption of
> > editing offline with full rez file based material the AEs inaccuracies
> > don't show up till you try to relink. Only then do you find duplicate
> > tape names etc... These errors would have shown up in a tape work flow
> > during recapture but now they are masked until you relink and the
> > sequence grabs the first instance of tape and time code it can find,
> > which may or may not be the right shot. This usually is a by product
> > of the addition of a tape name after the fact.
> > >
> > > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups .com, Dave Hogan <mactvman@ .> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > John,
> > > >
> > > > You know, with a few steps via the relink tool Media Composer has
> > had the capability for a while now to decompose based upon resolution
> > of the files.
> > > >
> > > > 1st step, start with a relink and select the method of "Specific
> > Resolution" it will look for everything equal or better than the video
> > rez you specify. Also make sure "Unlink Lower Quality Media" is
> > checked, and "Create New Sequence" is checked (or relink a copy of the
> > original sequence).
> > > >
> > > > A caveat here is that the re-link always unlinks all title media,
> > and may unlink imported effects. This is not a deal breaker, because
> > you get it back in a later step.
> > > >
> > > > The relink throws all the lower rez media off line, and then you
> > decompose the new sequence, selecting "Offline Media Only" and
> > "Captured Clips Only".
> > > >
> > > > After you have digitized all the decomposed clips, go back and do
> > a final relink, using "highest quality" and those pesky files that
> > were not tape sources, and were the correct rez or better, will come
> > back online without having to recreate title media or re-import.
> > > >
> > > > This capability has been around for a long time. My Media Composer
> > 2.8.4 has it. It is in 3.x, and I sure hope it is still in 4.x.
> > > >
> > > > Going via the relink step also picks up higher rez files that
> > might already be digitized (in a shared environment, or something done
> > a while back), so that you don't have to re-digitize footage already
> > on the system.
> > > >
> > > > I have heard some editors complain about using relink, but the
> > only time I have trouble with it is when I exceed 1,500 files per
> > folder on my drives (unity included). I have had several techs try to
> > tell me that systems can handle a far larger count than this, but I
> > stand by that number to this day. (Possibly because I work mostly on
> > Mac based AVIDs, and the OSX finder is a slow beast with lots of
> > files). Hope this filecount can go up a bit once Snow Leopard gets
> > certified, but I will wait and see on that one.
> > > >
> > > > Dave Hogan
> > > > Burbank CA
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __
> > > > From: johnrobmoore <bigfish@ >
> > > > To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups .com
> > > > Sent: Thu, September 24, 2009 11:12:25 AM
> > > > Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: MC 4 upgrades
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I like my version better but this is still nice. Say I've got a
> > mixture of offline and online resolution material. Wouldn't it be nice
> > to be able to decompose only the low res stuff leaving the full res
> > alone? Maybe down the line something like this could be added?
> > > >
> > > > _,_._,___
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
>
> --
> David Dawkins
> 780-905-9121
> dawk2@...
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


------------------------------------

Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/

Everything you MUST know about Color Correction in one book: http://tinyurl.com/ColorCorectionforvideo Get your copy todayYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments:

Post a Comment