Like I said, I'm evaluating and looking to use Resolve for teaching. When my University springs for external scopes (instead of giving the Vice-Chancellor a massive pay rise), I'll be right there, with my 65-year old eyes.
"Personally, grading in Symphony without external scopes would drive me nuts... the images are just too small for these late-40s eyes."
The thought of doing it with early 50s eyes was enough for me to spring for a Tek. scope. I never want to look back. ;-)
P.S.: Am I just too nerdy and unaware that when I hear people running Resolve without an external scope for broadcast work I cringe? I'm told those internal scopes are accurate and at one place I work they built a Resolve with no scope and brought in a Davinci operator for a few projects who used the internal scopes and the Panny monitor waveform/vectorscope to do a few shows. I'm not a fan of this trend but do I need to be more open minded?
Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (16) |
No comments:
Post a Comment