Saturday, April 1, 2023

[Avid-L2] Avid-L2 FAQ #guidelines-notice

         Welcome to the Avid-L2

                   FAQ!

AVID-L II Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

 

Subscribing (or unsubscribing) to the Avid-L2

Send an e-mail message to:

Avid-L2+subscribe@groups.io

 

Or, to unsubscribe, send e-mail to:

Avid-L2+unsubscribe@groups.io

 

Note that by subscribing, you are acknowledging that you have read

and understand this FAQ  See below for additional detail.

 

Your options for member types  can be reviewed on the group's home page.     At any time, you can view messages on the web site for this group itself

 

Membership types are Indvidual messages, Digests of 12 messages each, Daily Summary, special announcements only, or no mail at all to use the web portal only.

 

To change your member type, visit the group s.io web site and modify your membership type in the check boxes provided

 

Policies

 Despite what email address or handle you use, you should register as a Yahoo user to participate in the Avid-L2, for access to the web features of this group.  

Subscribers should set up an account with their legal first and last names, then send the request to join. 

 This is a Moderated list, and all subscription requests must be approved by the moderator(s).  I, please include your first and last name in the subscription request to the moderator when you request to join.

 

As always, Groups.io and the moderators of this list are not responsible for the use third parties may make of information you have made publicly available in this or any other public

forum.  Please take a look at the applicable  Yahoo Terms of Use and Privacy

Policy for more information about public  information and forums.

 

Off Topic Filtering.   Part of the interest of the Avid-L2 is it's range

of topics.  If you are posting an Off-topic thread,  please preface the

subject with  OT:  Use the colon after the letters. 

 Email filters and rules can be used by subscribers to move Off Topic posts to where ever they would like in their email organization by using a rule/filter with Sender of: Avid-l2@yahoogroups.com  and subject contains  OT: .

 

The Avid-L is a helpful yet rough around the edges crowd. Topics that are not welcome are religion, politics, and other disruptive topics that interfere with the operation of the list.  Moderation of these topics will be quick,  so simply put-  Let's all just play nice 

 

Commercial Posts must be prefaced with [commercial] in the subject or they will be rejected.   

Jobs should have #job in their header, and press releases should have [pr] in their header

 

Background

 

Avid-L was established in 1994 at Calvin College by Steven Koster.

It was created to be a forum for Avid users to meet, discuss, and share

information.

 

 Avid-L quickly grew into the premiere on-line users group for

professional film and video editors. It was one of the earliest examples

of an Internet community, allowing hundreds of editors worldwide to

share their experiences and expertise with their peers. There was no

better place for a professional Avid editor to get such wealth of

informed professional advice.

At various times, individual subscribers volunteered services to the

group. Searchable archives were maintained by Germany's Berlin Users

Group as well as the UIUC. A tips & tricks list was posted by Andy

Birkhead of Innovative Edit. Wes Plate, a longtime contributor, not only

shared key techniques on his Web site, he also created a photo gallery

for members' portraits.

 

In 1997, several subscribers began a tradition of meeting in person at

the NAB trade show in Las Vegas. The first gatherings were organized by Jaime Fowler. In 1999,

Avid Technology itself began sponsoring these gatherings as an exclusive reception and seminar for Avid-L members only.  In 2002, this changed to the "Avid Users Group" meeting.

 

By 1999, Avid-L boasted over 1600 subscribers, exhibiting a true

international scope with over 300  international members. The community

included participants from a wide variety of well-known corporate

organizations in broadcasting, technical, and content creation fields,

as well as and  multiple local TV stations, colleges, and universities.

 

In 2000, Avid-L joined AvidProNet.com, and then, in 2002, was integrated

Into Avid.com.  

 

In 2005 Due to problems with signal to noise ratio and abusive posters, the Avid-L2 was formed. A year later the Avid-L was discontinued by Avid.

 

At the middle of 2006, the L2 has around 1100 members, with plenty of "lurker only" members who simply use the web version of the list.  The L2 is spam-free, by moderation and with Groups.io’s tools and will remain that way.  

 

In 2019,  the Group has migrated to Groups,io from the previous Yahoo engine-   the Groups.io page  maintains the complete Avid-L2 archive.    The original Avid-L archive has been lost to the history of the interwebz.

 

Welcome, and Enjoy!

 

Extras!

With a Groups.io account tied to your subscription to the Avid-L2,  you can use the web features of the Group.

 

Calendar  Various Avid events are in the Calender.  If you have an event you'd like posted,  pull down and fill out the Calendar event request and send it to any Moderator

 

Database - The database area contains Avid Feature requests,  Help Wanted,  Freelance Listings and For Sale sections.  Feel free to add your listings to any of these areas.  Job Postings will remain up for 1 month.   Please date all postings to the database areas, being pertinent is a good way to be.

 

Files-  The files section contains various sundry files, including the latest Avid release notes.  Check back often for changes.

 

Photos -  Pictures of your Avid setup are welcome, or pictures relating to a post you need a photo to explain.  Photos will be posted after moderator approval.  Who knows, your picture might grace the front page for a while.

 

Links-  Various helpful links, including direct links to Avid CPR releases can be found here, also the link to the archives.

 

JDS

 

_._,_._,_

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#136142) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Mute #guidelines-notice
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [administrator242.death@blogger.com]

_._,_._,_

Wednesday, March 29, 2023

Re: [Avid-L2] Quicklimes with wrong levels flags.

My scope would be connected to a DNxIO sdi output which I wouldn't think was ColorSync controlled.
_._,_._,_

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#136141) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [administrator242.death@blogger.com]

_._,_._,_

Sunday, March 26, 2023

Re: [Avid-L2] Quicklimes with wrong levels flags.

The 'gama' atom is 'old'
But it 'can' be there. If the Transfer Function is set to 2 (unspecified), it will be used if present.
(Custom output Gamma 2.4 from Resolve will do this.)

But this will only show on a ColorSync display, it has noting to do with the file, just how to display it. 

If you read a scope, is it connected to a ColorSync controlled output?

Bouke / edit 'B

videotoolshed.com
Van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS Nijmegen, the Netherlands
+31 6 21817248
If you want to send me large files, please use:
https://videotoolshed.wetransfer.com/

On 26 Mar 2023, at 03:34, John Moore <bigfish@pacbell.net> wrote:

So for a test I took a 23.976 sequence one second of smpte bars and exported same as source which is DNX 175X one with legal checked and once with Scale to Full Range checked.  Then I did a ProResHQ export using a custom export which goes through the QT engine.  I'm on MC 2018.12.15.  Here are screen grabs.  I guess I'm not sure this app displays the metadata flag that tells how QT should interpret the video essence.  I guess Full Range or Legal doesn't change the color matrix or primaries.  I'm in an area where I know how to read a scope but don't know exactly what metadata types of information define full range vs. legal video essence is this the colr atom and or the gama atom?  Or is it another atom?  Also there is mention on Lift Gamma Gain about tagging files 1-1-1.  I'm not versed in this aspect of file metadata.  Here is what I read:

Sebastian Bodirsky said: ↑
I wonder if there is a downside to this metadata specification, or why else it is not common practice by all NLEs. But probably there is already a thread about this somewhere...
That metadata is supported for display by many post apps, but only editable in a few of them, hence the need for a metadata editing app like this.

Resolve allows setting that metadata on export, while NLEs like Premiere and FCPX default to tagging all SDR exports as 1-1-1. FCPX is at least internally color managed around 1-1-1, while Premiere Pro is just a hopeless mess since it doesn't color manage for 1-1-1 yet it tags outputs that way.
 
Jamie LeJeune, Apr 19, 2021
#9

 
Erik Lindahl

1,128

322

0
Jamie LeJeune said: ↑
That metadata is supported for display by many post apps, but only editable in a few of them, hence the need for a metadata editing app like this.

Resolve allows setting that metadata on export, while NLEs like Premiere and FCPX default to tagging all SDR exports as 1-1-1. FCPX is at least internally color managed around 1-1-1, while Premiere Pro is just a hopeless mess since it doesn't color manage for 1-1-1 yet it tags outputs that way.
Premiere Pro is even worse than this.

- Material will always export as 1-1-1 in SDR
- Material with other tags than 1-1-1 will likely be converted to 1-1-1
- You can't affect how Premiere reads footage (i.e. force all SDR to be read as Rec 709 / Gamma 2.4).

So if you render files externally tagged with Rec 709 / Gamma 2.2, Rec 709 / Gamma 2.4 and Rec 709 / Gamma 2.6 they will all render differently with-in Premiere and be converted to a Rec 709 / Rec 709 (1-1-1) file. Files tagged with Rec 709 / Rec 709 are rendered as Rec 709 / Gamma 2.4.

The above behaviour seems unique to Premiere and AME thought. After Effects in a color managed workflow seems to assume Rec 709 / Gamma 2.4 and render out 1-1-1. It makes sense the color managed app disregards these tags…

Oh, I think since some versions back AVID respects these tags also.
 
Erik Lindahl, Apr 19, 2021
#10



Here are screen shots of my bars exports:

<dummyfile.0.part>
<dummyfile.1.part>