It's actually a little worse than that, Steve. They are structuring the
group to give them the "input" that they want to hear. The $300 part is
just a way of screening out what they don't want to hear. At the same
time, they get to proudly proclaim that they're listening. --J.B.
Steve Hullfish wrote:
>
>
> I agree about ACA Scott. Actually, I see it as a BAD thing for most of
> us. It's downright silly, and I think the only people who will bother
> to be a part of it are the broadcasters. A user community that you
> have to pay to be a part of? Seriously? Who else does this?
>
> It used to be that Avid would help you and sponsor and PAY to build
> and support local communities and customer bases.
>
> ACA does not show that Avid is listening. It shows that they want to
> turn what was a drain on expenses into a cash cow. "Hey! We'll listen
> to you if you pay us $300 for the weekend!"
>
> Steve
>
> On Feb 7, 2014, at 8:45 AM, switthaus@mac.com
> <mailto:switthaus@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> Explain to me this point, as I still see the ACA as a pure PR move to
>> show that Avid "is listening".
>
>
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (25) |
No comments:
Post a Comment