If you merge the two, then you have to raise the price of the tool across the board.
It's better to keep MC as the lower cost option and the Symphony as the higher cost option because quite honestly, not everyone needs everything that's in Symphony, so why pay for the extra features you don't need?
I might get one Symphony eventually as a finish workstation but keep all the MCs for the bulk of our editing since it's cheaper.
Walter
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, op <owen@...> wrote:
>
> I wish Avid was listening to this request! So many have been asking for this for years. They listened after so many years
> and opened to 3rd party I/O, how many years will it take to merge Symphony into MC?
>
> Owen
>
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:43 AM, haus wrote:
>
> > yeah, maybe they will finally merge the products into one affordable MC with all the bells and whistles...that would be the best they could do right now.
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, op <owen@> wrote:
> > >
> > > oooh, sounds like some more good news about Avid MC is gonna happen at NAB. Yay!!
> > > owen
> > >
> > > On Apr 4, 2012, at 5:13 PM, walter biscardi wrote:
> > > "In a few weeks I should be able to share more about our decision to go Avid but for now, the article is about as much as I can say."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
No comments:
Post a Comment