You would think, but when that started happening in analog world, we all freaked out when we saw and heard what the networks did to our spots...
I've been spearheading making sure all of my mixers get a head start at compliance with the ITU spec. If they can hit the spec, then they'll start to figure out how to get the best sounding stuff through the broadcasters' <whatever the new version of brickwall limiter is>.
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "blafarm" <blafarm@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the links.
>
> And, this crossed my path last night:
> http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/13/us/fcc-loud-commercials/index.html
>
> Seems the burden of equalizing levels in the US is more on the broadcasters -- than the spot producers.
>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Spano" <cutandcover@> wrote:
> >
> > It's been all anyone in broadcasting (and Congress) can talk about for the past couple of years. CALM Act, ITU-R BS.1770, -24 LKFS +/-2, etc.
> >
> > Couple of links:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_Advertisement_Loudness_Mitigation_Act
> >
> > http://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-BS.1770-0-200607-S/en
> >
> > http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/consumerawareness/a/When-And-How-The-Calm-Act-Will-Be-Enforced.htm
> >
> > http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/13/us-fcc-idUSTRE7BC27R20111213
> >
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "blafarm" <blafarm@> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Not sure what the EBU does over there, but over here the loudness specs are final. http://tech.ebu.ch/loudness
> > >
> > > Curious ... I've not heard of any pending initiative like this proposed for the States. Anyone else?
>
No comments:
Post a Comment