Whenever a director contacts me about a project, I bring up shooting specs. The way I put it (to make it as scary as possible): Please shoot at 23.98 unless you want your footage to look like a soap opera. They never do. (The next issue that comes up is about shooting in log, but that's another rant.)
Wilson's advice to record "in the field as DNxHD 145," thereby avoiding all transcoding, is an interesting idea and useful for his workflow, but having to transcode footage is not in my list of "Top Ten Things Shooters Do That Create Headaches in Post."
Wilson's advice to record "in the field as DNxHD 145," thereby avoiding all transcoding, is an interesting idea and useful for his workflow, but having to transcode footage is not in my list of "Top Ten Things Shooters Do That Create Headaches in Post."
_._,_._,_
Groups.io Links:
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#134691) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [administrator242.death@blogger.com]
_._,_._,_
No comments:
Post a Comment