Most of my 4K Avid work has been on stage shows where the source clips will be an hour plus in length. Now that we are heading into a more typical series in 4K we are finding in our transcoding tests that the shorter clips seem to transcode faster. Obviously less material will transcode faster but the AE is noticing it's seeming to be way faster.
Typically longer ama clips have been more taxing on the system in my experience. Can anyone confirm or deny that when ama linking to longer clips it's more taxing to Avid than shorter clips. And if this would make it so that say a one hour single clip would take a lot longer to transcode than a bunch of shorter clips that add up to an hour duration.
My gut says the longer clips are harder to transcode but I don't really have any science behind it. I would think there may be caching issues or taxing the ram more with the longer clips but I'm just speculating out loud.
Anybody know what the difference under the hood with long ama clips vs. shorter ones and how it might relate to faster processing of transcodes.
John Moore Barking Trout Productions Studio City, CA bigfish@pacbell.net
__._,_.___
Posted by: John Moore <bigfish@pacbell.net>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (1) |
Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.
this is the Avid-L2
SPONSORED LINKS
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment