Few things:
Bluray is not full level afaik, don't know the encoder, but are you sure you should not feed it 709, or at least tell it the source is 709?
a .2 gamma difference does not show "much brighter" imho. It will look 'slightly different'.
It should be easy to spot. Blown out highlights will indicate RGB wasn't the correct option.
Or, it will indicate that you should have brought the source back to 709 on the import in Avid.
Did you watch scopes in Avid? On the blurry?
On Oct 2, 2016, at 16:30, David Dodson davaldod@gmail.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:I have a wrinkle to add to this. I'm getting mostly good results with the below method. However, I have what might be a unique situation…I have a DPX sequence for a feature that was graded in Baselight in a room in which the Dolby monitor was set to a 2.4 gamma. The DPX sequence was taken to the DCP place at which they, understanding the rec709 2.4 gamma, made a DCP. We screened it yesterday at a local theater of note, and it looked very right. So…I took that same DPX sequence, opened it in Media Composer via AMA, did the mixdown to ProRes422, exported Same as Source at Full Levels, then imported that into Encore as the asset to be used in authoring and burning a Blu ray. However…The resulting Blu ray is much brighter than it should be. It bears not a lot of resemblance to the DCP we screened or to the look in the grading suite. It looks more like it's showing us a 2.2 gamma (and this is on a quality Samsung plasma on Standard color).So I ask, what are we missing in terms of the 2.4 gamma relationship to this workflow? Because for the life of me, I can't get something on BRD (or in a QT, for that matter) that looks like either the grading suite or the DCP. How — how — do we get it to have the same relative gamma in our BRDs and QTs?Signed,Frustrated in BurbankOn Sep 30, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Mark Spano cutandcover@gmail.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Mixdown sequence to ProRes 422Export Same As Source - full levelsalways right on.On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Lou Wirth loutv@mindspring.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Anyone have the right formula for QT ProRes 422 exports out of avid. Lately clients have been asking for masters as ProRes and I jump between Avid settings being Legal or expanded color full range. Legal seems a bit washed out and full range seems a bit dark. In QT settings I go between gamma correction automated and none. Its a lengthy process exporting each setting and never seems to be the right match. Never for broadcast. Usually going to server or once in a while to DVD.
What is the right combo of settings to go to Pro Res?
thanks
Lou
Lou Wirth Productions
500Tamal Plaza, Suite 522
Corte Madera, CA 94925
www.louwirth.com
415-924-9411p
__._,_.___
Posted by: Bouke <bouke@editb.nl>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (5) |
Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.
this is the Avid-L2
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment