Ugh. AudioVision was so cool. And so easy. Transferring a project from MC to AV was so simple. And it worked perfectly with Avid media. Yes, AudioVision could have been such an awesome tool if they had continued to develop it. And it would have allowed MC to remain a much more pure editor.
Jay
On Jan 20, 2016, at 11:34 AM, 'Job ter Burg (L2B)' Job_L2@terburg.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:It's worse. They had AudioVision with features that currently exist neither in MC nor in PT. Including patented stuff, IIRC.On 20 jan. 2016, at 18:23, Steve Hullfish Steve@veralith.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:In one of my upcoming Art of the Cut interviews, I speak to a feature film editor about the critical importance of more than 24 tracks of audio. Maybe Avid should by ProTools and then the audio features would port over… oh wait… they did that (bought them) and they didn't (port over.)
__._,_.___
Posted by: Jay Mahavier <jay_mahavier@earthlink.net>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (6) |
this is the Avid-L2
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment