---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <oliverpeters@...> wrote :
Canon is written Canon, not Cannon.
Oliver you must not be using the proper spelling LUT to read my posts. It clearly reads Cannon on my screen, the fact that you are seeing "Cannnon" means you are not balanced for the my IN BAY SPELLING LUT. It looks fine to the crew here. Not only is the spelling correct the color on Cannon is perfect and should need no correction in post. I could send you my IN BAY SPELLING LUT but you will probably have better luck just spelling from scratch.
Once my spelling LUT is standardized it will make spell check obsolete. We all know the way we've been spelling for all these years needs to be revamped regardless of all the infrastructure in place.
---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <oliverpeters@...> wrote :
Canon is written Canon, not Cannon. The EI is basically what you "rate" the optimal exposure of the sensor to be, analogous to film being rated as 25 or 250 or 500, etc. In digital cameras this determines where the signal falls within the dynamic range of the sensor. Think of it as the equivalent of creating a "dense negative" in the film world.
Where this affects production and post is how this informs lighting decisions. Let's say it is a"250" camera and you set it to be 1000. Now you are "seeing" deeper into the blacks. Therefore, there may be a tendency to under-light the scene, because you can "see" everything. But in reality, what you see is noisy, which you discover in post. OTOH, if you run it at 250, then you really have to add a lot of light to get to see what you want to see in the scene.
- Oliver
__._,_.___
Posted by: bigfish@pacbell.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (9) |
this is the Avid-L2
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment