I thought I reeded it wrong at first. But then I remembered English is a second language for Americans :)
On 13 May 2015, at 7:32 pm, RRF Avid rrfavid@hotsprocketfilms.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Rather poor wording on Avid's part, eh? I tell you, whoever is righting these Investor Relations releasesKind of speaks for itself.- Rich :-)On May 13, 2015, at 8:29 AM, switthaus@mac.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:" I suspect these are the numbers of people who have dipped their toe in the water of monthly subscriptions. "
Rather poor wording on Avid's part, eh? I tell you, whoever is righting these Investor Relations releases better go back to school. How do you quantify "excitement" to an investor?So should we believe the 100,000 number too? Does your confidential information confirm that the 8,000 are "toe-dippers" or what? Perhaps this is just a Q1 2015 number?However, I do agree that the 8,000 number is absurdly low if we are looking at subscriptions as a whole, which is what this release implies.
__._,_.___
Posted by: "Mikeparsons.tv" <mikeparsons.tv@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (8) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment