Jeff,
This is a preview of what they will be displaying at the upcoming Adobe MAX conference. I'm sure more detail will become available then.
MK
On Oct 15, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Jeff Hedberg jeff@unioneditorial.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
I wish the second and third sequence were actually the same.
It's hard to tell what really got done by the 'magic'.
------------------
Jeff HedbergDirector of Operations
Union Editorial
575 Broadway,6th floor
New York, NY 10012On Oct 15, 2014, at 4:29 PM, Benjamin Hershleder Ben@ContactBen.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:I agree. It works much better than FluidMorph.FM would not do as good a job when the frameswere as different as one or two of those in the Adobe example.BOn Oct 15, 2014, at 1:19 PM, "Michael Kedor mikedor@gmail.com [Avid-L2]" <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:I've used fluid morph for this before, but this Adobe feature appears to be superior.
MKOn Oct 15, 2014, at 1:08 PM, Joe Womble cre8tive@gmail.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:As a producer and editor, I love this. But I fear this will be used unethically to edit content and thereby change the message or intent. Scary!On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Michael Kedor mikedor@gmail.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Freaking voodoo by Adobe.
Michael Kedor
__._,_.___
Posted by: Michael Kedor <mikedor@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (8) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment