We were not involved in this QC as it was done by the network just for the international version. Mind you the domestic version has the same "issues" and was not flagged by their QC department nor were they by the QC company we used prior to delivering the show.
The point of QC is to list the errors they find and not speculate that there are more that they didn't catch. I understand about the degree of scrutiny a QC gets being dependent on how much the client wants to pay. Some times I see that mix minus vo tracks are only spot checked etc.... I guess I just feel that if the network feels a second QC is warranted for international it should flag everything that the network deems important. Now if the network is okay with "SOME (NO ALL) EXAMPLES" being fixed that is what they are going to get.
I also like the blanked statement that "blanking in this section varies, may be camera hood". A fair assessment but IIRC there is no official blanking spec in the new digital world. There is nothing like the 10.9 to 11.2 micro seconds from the days of yore. I realize excessive blanking still can show up as black on the edges but is there really no official spec guidelines? I've been led to believe from threads here and other discussions it is not longer a spec. Am I confused about this.
Posted by: bigfish@pacbell.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (3) |
No comments:
Post a Comment