well excuuuuuuuuuuse me.
yeah i saw that list. just thought I'd add something positive to all the complaining.
Owen's iphone
On Jul 20, 2013, at 3:11 AM, "Job ter Burg (L2B)" <Job_L2@terburg.com> wrote:
>
> Gents,
>
> Could we keep threads on topic, please?
>
> Owen, the What's New has a quick guide to apply LUTs & a list of supported LUTs
>
> http://resources.avid.com/SupportFiles/attach/WhatsNew_Editor_v7.0_v11.0.pdf
>
> Job
>
> On 20 jul. 2013, at 06:42, owen@thenowcorporation.com wrote:
>
> > I love applying LUTs to log C Alexa files! Yay! i'd like to know if theres a spec sheet to give to DP's
> > so they can send us avid friendly luts from the set. thanks owen
> >
> > On Jul 19, 2013, at 3:39 PM, "Job ter Burg (L2B)" <Job_L2@terburg.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 19 jul. 2013, at 09:06, pat_adc <pat@horridge.org.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>> increasingly polished and capable tools
> >>
> >> I'm more pessimistic about this than you. I see the three A-companies spending most of their time catching up, rather than innovating. If they do innovate, they launch immature products or features. With Avid, statistically, you then have about 5% chance that the feature is ever developed beyond its .0 implementation.
> >>
> >> Script Based Editing stems from the 90's. Today, it still does not have 16x9 windows in the script.
> >> Change Lists were never developed since the 90's, even though the need for Change Lists is increasing.
> >> BWAV support is still as limited as it was 10 years ago, even though it is the de facto standard for production sound.
> >> SubCap, Find, Universal Mastering, ScriptSync, PhraseFind etc. were never completed, they are still at the level they were when originally introduced.
> >> v7 has Spanned Markers, FrameFlex and Target Masks, neither of which are fully functional, and there is no way to tell if they'll ever be fixed or finished.
> >>
> >> And that's just a few examples. They seem to tick the check box for a feature and move on, rather than properly thinking about what the underlying workflow problem or challenge the feature is supposed to help editors face.
> >>
> >> Some folks say these features are for a niche group, a group that cannot expect manufacturers to work on the stuff that only they need. Leaving this niche of high end professionals (for lack of a better desciption) without any choice, as all of the A-companies now focus on the middle end at the lowest cost, and only offer middle-of-the-road solutions that they have to market to generic users.
> >>
> >> I'd glady pay 5K for MC if they finally fixed and finished many of the features on my list. 999USD for a new MC license is great, but it does not raise more funds for R&D, I reckon.
> >>
> >> J
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (14) |
No comments:
Post a Comment