Cg shots and all digital comps were scanned at 1k - there was extensive articles at the time about the whole pipeline - ill see if I can dig some up when I have time.
Best regards
Mike
On 14 Jun, 2013, at 7:54 PM, David Ross <speckydave@gmail.com> wrote:
> Where do you get this from?
> Titanic was shot 35mm - are you saying that the post was completed in SD
> and then printed back to film from that? Or am I totally misunderstanding
> what you mean by "1K"?
>
> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120338/technical?ref_=tt_dt_spec
>
> D.
>
> On 14 June 2013 02:19, Mikeparsons.tv <mikeparsons.tv@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > And again...
> >
> > Titanic was 1k. Don't think it was 'just there' resolution isn't the whole
> > story :)
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (38) |
No comments:
Post a Comment