I will suggest that as a possibility.
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Mikeparsons.tv" <mikeparsons.tv@...> wrote:
>
> But being helpful instead of sarcastic - have you tried using neat video to clean it up? I've removed a hum bar caused by a massive generator on a shoot down a mine before using it...
>
> Best regards
>
> Mike
>
> On 13 Jun, 2013, at 12:50 PM, "Mikeparsons.tv" <mikeparsons.tv@...> wrote:
>
> > You really only needed the last 4 words...
> >
> > On 13 Jun, 2013, at 12:21 PM, "johnrobmoore" <bigfish@...> wrote:
> >
> >> It was a standup performance on a theater stage. They shot 29.97P with an ISO of 1600, which is quite high but we think they irised down the cameras to get more depth of field so focus wasn't such a problem. According to the offline editor the head on camera with a medium waste shot would go out of focus if the performer moved back 6 inches to a foot. Sounds like a real cameraman nightmare hence the high ISO to compensate for the irised down lens to improve DOF. Really the wrong tool for the job but I guess it saves them money in production. I don't know what shutter angle but the colorist who looked at the footage thought ground loop and he has more experience with Red footage so I would think he'd have brought up shutter angle if it seemed like the culprit. The colorist did mention Reds having some issues with HMI lights. Given this crew couldn't even get us down converts that are in sync to the Red Raw files nothing surprises me anymore.
> >>
> >> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Benjamin Hershleder <Ben@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I'm curious:
> >> > - what lights are they using (HMI?),
> >> > - what frame rate are they shooting,
> >> > - what's the shutter speed, and
> >> > - what's the shutter angle?
> >> >
> >> > Possibly one of those questions will lead to the solution (?)
> >> >
> >> > B
> >> >
> >> > ----
> >> > Benjamin Hershleder
> >> > Book: http://tinyurl.com/avidmc-book
> >> > Site: http://ContactBen.com
> >> >
> >> > Wear It In Post!
> >> > Fun T-shirts, mousepads, mugs & more
> >> > for Post Production Professionals
> >> > http://www.WearItInPost.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Jun 12, 2013, at 6:49 PM, John Moore wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On the mulitcamera Red Epic stage shoot I've been helping on they finally brought in a Resolve Colorist and we found that there appears to be a 60 Hz like hum line traveling from top to bottom in multiple cameras all Red Epics. A ground loop was suggested by the colorist. This was a multicam shoot with external Pix recorders for the offline media that turned out to be 2 frames off, but that's another story. I'm curious how a ground loop/floating ground could effect the internal Red feed from the sensor to the Raw file. Is the ground loop actually effecting the sensor itself which then feeds into the Raw file. The line is thinner that a typical 60 hum bar but it is a horizontal line that brightens up the picture as it passes through. It's mostly noticeable on medium grey pillars in the back ground. We see it in multiple cameras. It sounds like there a plenty of ground loop sources with external Pix recorder and feeds to director's monitors
> >> > > etc... If it's not a floating ground I'm wondering it maybe some new LED style lights might have been used or some other new exotic lighting source that might have created the problem. Anybody seen anything like this?
> >> > >
> >> > > John Moore
> >> > >
> >> > > Barking Trout Productions
> >> > >
> >> > > Studio City, CA
> >> > >
> >> > > bigfish@
> >> > >
> >> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (8) |
No comments:
Post a Comment