Oh, the A-53 Split warpy takes me back- perfect for water reflections...
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "johnrobmoore" <bigfish@...> wrote:
>
> Well a reimport with the bottom fit to raster and file type odd upper field fixed the break up. Now the letterboxed appearing clip has no banding but there is a few lines at the top that seem like funny video almost like a mistake but it's far enough up I can easily crop it out. I don't know what is causing that but at least the video is clean. I also noticed that the imported clip had one hour time code and when ama linking to the .mov the time code started at zero. I guess that points to the original clip being a traditional import but with some off setting that messed the import up.
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, John Moore <bigfish@> wrote:
> >
> > Is there a way to tell if a .mov clip was ama linked and transcode or traditionally imported from just the clip. I have a clip that I can highlight and open the batch import dialogue box, does that indicate it was a traditional import? This 8 plus minute .mov that has weird horizontal banding. It looks kinda like the old warp split effect of an A-53. The clip does not look like bad field order but more like the aforementioned split effect. The AE just brought me the original file and it turns out this is an HD file. Now I'm thinking that they imported with the bottom choice of fit to raster. I base this on the fact that the original clip appears letterboxed. With this in mind I'm thinking this looks a lot like the artifacting when Avid tries to stretch DV vertically 6 lines to fill the 720x486. I wouldn't think that stretching would occur with the bottom fit to raster selection but am I wrong. And of course this is a long clip that
> > takes 20 minutes to traditionally import. Oh well time to bite the bullet and reimport and see what happens if I override the import settings. Man I love file based soooooo much.
> >
> > John Moore
> >
> > Barking Trout Productions
> >
> > Studio City, CA
> >
> > bigfish@
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (3) |
No comments:
Post a Comment