Absolutely.
I was a very early adopter of node based systems as you know going all the way back to Eddie and silicon grail. I even did a movie with avid illusion...
I currently own 2 smokes, avid symphony and nuke so fusion may well fit in well with my redesign.
As always exciting times but yeah for now I'm done with smoke 2013 it just stumbles along constantly disappointing. Might get there in a year or so but for how it doesn't fit my workflow.
Ill still be running flame on bigger jobs for my existing client base of course...
On 13 Apr, 2013, at 9:46 PM, "oliverpetersvidy" <oliverpeters@oliverpeters.com> wrote:
> > Mike Parsons wrote:
> > If there was a Mac version of fusion I would
> > replace my smokes entirely right now.
> > Baselight still feels over complex compared to resolve.
>
> Damn Mike! You're a voice from the past. I see you over at the Autodesk forums. Have you been lurking here? I'm surprised you would move away from Smoke. If there were a Mac version of DS, would you have moved to DS?
>
> In any case, Baselight takes a similar approach (layers) to SpeedGrade and I think the color science is a bit more "filmic" than Resolve. Obviously Resolve has solid creds, so this is more of an impression on my part, based on the on-screen results I've seen. Resolve 10 should be quite nice. Not only some introductory editing tools (aimed at conforming and tweaks there), but also Open FX, so you can use plug-ins like Sapphire.
>
> Overall a pretty wild time with no real, single, "perfect" solution, yet.
>
> - Oliver
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (49) |
No comments:
Post a Comment