I've given up on adding tape names to AMA linked clips, although I do
typically add a custom column to track the card name, just in case.
I could be wrong, but I think in earlier versions of Avid, timeline dupe
detection didn't work unless there was a tape name associated with a
clip. Adding tape names could also help disambiguating duplicate clip
names.
Cheers,
--Michael
On 13-02-10 1:55 PM, Mark Spano wrote:
> Am I in the minority? I've never added a tape name to any AMA linked
> material and I've never had a problem relinking. If the AMA material comes
> from different cards, I just keep those as separate bins. I understand the
> want to give everything a tape name, but I don't, and it's never bitten me.
> Seems like a lot of extra work and hassle to add tape names to things that
> were never tapes.
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:31 PM, johnrobmoore bigfish@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> My understanding is after adding tape names to the ama clips if you later
>> go back and remount the ama volume to a new bin you have to manually readd
>> the tape name to the clips before relinking. Usually if you have the
>> original ama bin with the tape names already added and you have the
>> original source volume mounted and open Avid that bin and the clips with
>> tape names already will be online. Of course the nebulous nature of ama
>> doesn't always play fair which I'm learning on this project. Just another
>> reminder when I don't get involved in this side of the work I really miss
>> out on finding all the traps and hurdles there are. It renews my
>> appreciation for the AEs who stay on top of this stuff and make it work.
>> Unfortunately I find many AEs just link and go and then manually overcut
>> later when things aren't working. I've seen huge cluster flops of late all
>> due to a lack of proper preparation of ama material.
>>
>>
>> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Michael Brockington wrote:
>>> Maybe this has changed, but at one point I found that if you assign
>>> tapenames to AMA clips and then relink the AMA clips, it erases the tape
>>> names. You don't have to specifically choose to relink AMA clips, it
>>> also happens if you use AMA to open the same folder of clips in a
>>> different bin for instance. I imagine that if you've set up AMA so that
>>> changes in the folder of AMA clips cause a rescan, then any change to
>>> the disk folder would also be sufficient to wipe your tapenames.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> --Michael
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13-02-10 12:03 PM, johnrobmoore wrote:
>>>> Well this morning with a clearer head I'm back at the so called one
>>>> button process that just happens over night by itself NOT!!! I don't
>>>> know if I missed them or they were lost but now several of the reels,
>>>> uh Cards, don't have Tape Names that I thought I put in. Even going
>>>> back to the original ama bins doesn't have them so F me skipping I
>>>> probably messed up there. Also a couple clips have lost there audio.
>>>> Oh well 2 out of 400 plus isn't so bad and the audio is there when I
>>>> relink to the original ama clips.
>>>>
>>>> Now here's the new kicker Roger. I found in redoing the clips with
>>>> missing audio when I do the original ama transcode to DNX 220 I didn't
>>>> have to check the Convert Audio box and the audio came accross on the
>>>> new clips. It is only when I later go to transcode the DNX 220 to DNX
>>>> 45 that I have to check the Convert Audio box. From this I figure that
>>>> Avid handles the initial ama transcode to DNX differently the
>>>> subsequent transcode. That seems a little asymmetrical to me but what
>>>> do I know? After all I didn't spend all night doing it wrong, uh oh
>>>> wait..... ;-(
>>>>
>>>> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com ,
>>>> Roger wrote:
>>>>> You do need to do this with a Transcode but not with a Consolidate.
>>>> Needs a 'copy associated audio?' checkbox.
>>>>> On 10 Feb 2013, at 09:05, John Moore wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So on my ama transcoding anime today's sphincter tightening lessen
>>>> is when transcoding to a lower resolution you need to check the
>>>> Convert Audio check box to get audio included on the transcoded clips.
>>>> Now my instinct was to just check the Convert Video and select DNX 45
>>>> after all I'm just converting the video and doing nothing to the audio
>>>> as far as conversion. Well I moved the new media over to the original
>>>> project on the offline system and voila video no audio. WTF. Turns out
>>>> the Convert Audio Checkbox actually enables the audio to be part of
>>>> the transcoded clips so checking it and leaving it at 48K for my
>>>> sources is the correct thing to do to get all the tracks video and
>>>> audio onto the new low res clip. Now here's the gotcha that caused me
>>>> a moment of sheer panic. Without me realizing that the transcoded
>>>> files were playing audio from the original files and not the new ones
>>>> I'd created I figured I'd just delete my transcodes and start> > over.
>>>> Well guess what the DNX 45 media was deleted along with the audio from
>>>> the original high res media on the original drive. Ouch big time
>>>> especially because this was the only source I didn't have original
>>>> card media for. Fortunately I had previously copied the clips to a
>>>> third drive so I was able to find it there and replace it back on the
>>>> original drive. When I used reveal file I got a prompt the video and
>>>> audio were on separate drives but when deleting the transcoded clips
>>>> there was no such prompt or warning.
>>>>>> The moral is to always check the convert audio box even if you
>>>> aren't really converting the audio otherwise MOS will be your middle
>>>> name. I'm sure this has come up before but it obviously didn't stick
>>>> with me until tonight. Hopefully this will save someone else from
>>>> having a massive tush pucker like I'm still recovering from.
>>>>>> John Moore
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Barking Trout Productions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Studio City, CA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bigfish@
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> With best wishes,
>>>>> Roger Shufflebottom
>>>>> +44 7973 543 660
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>
>>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (16) |
No comments:
Post a Comment