Agreed here. My place is 10 Symphony systems, 11 Pro Tools systems, (and 1
Scratch). AAF all over the place.
People ask for OMF all the time and I say OMFG stop saying OMF when you
mean AAF...
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Job ter Burg (L2B) <Job_L2@terburg.com>wrote:
> **
>
>
>
> Mostly, sound editors will have been working with AAF's for many years
> without them realizing it, as they still call these exports OMF's, since
> that's what they learned it was called back in the days. Makes no sense to
> export OMF to Pro Tools anymore - IMHO.
>
>
> On 9 okt. 2012, at 21:52, Marcel Brassard <correctype@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
> > Many sound editors prefer an OMF over AAF.
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment