Amending my response, I have hopes after reading this;
http://www.macworld.com/article/1165108/first_look_final_cut_pro_x_10_0_3_restores_professional_features_adds_notable_new_ones.html
If its true, I take it all back
John Kilgour
On Oct 24, 2012, at 9:24 AM, "john@digitalcut.com" <john@digitalcut.com> wrote:
> Ok, maybe the word suck was too much. It's brilliant! It's awesome! Is that what you want to hear? It's so awesome, that all of my broadcast clients have yet to install it in their professional environment. Most of NYC is either still on FCP 7 (which IS awesome), or has gone back to Avid. I really don't have the time to school you on the well documented reasons why FCP-X is crippled.
>
> John
>
> On Oct 24, 2012, at 8:38 AM, "haus" <switthaus@mac.com> wrote:
>
> > Thats the best answer you can give? Smells like fear to me.
> >
> > Tell us all why it sucks?
> >
> > sw
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "john@..." <john@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Google it brother
> > >
> > > John Kilgour
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Oct 23, 2012, at 9:19 PM, Philip Hodgetts <philip@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Oct 23, 2012, at 5:59 PM, john@... wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It still sucks (for broadcast)
> > > > >
> > > > > John Kilgour
> > > >
> > > > Specifically why? You may well be right but I'd like to know why.
> > > >
> > > > Philip
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (13) |
No comments:
Post a Comment