Re: [Avid-L2] 100 v 145

Why mixdown instead of a top track submaster effect rendered as DNxHD? Does
this go back to the mixdowns-are-faster-than-rendering-since-5.0
discussion, or was that debunked?


Brendan McCullough
video editing • post-production
(267)-536-9821
brendanmccullough dot com <http://www.brendanmccullough.com>
@thisisbpm <http://twitter.com/thisisbpm> on twitter
LinkedIn profile <http://www.linkedin.com/in/brendanmccullough>



On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Jeff Young <jymedia.com@gmail.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Greg Huson wrote:
>
> > We do the same. Do not mixdown to xdcam35, either- use a DNx.
>
> Yes! Sorry to have left that out. Mixing-down to DNxHD 145 or equivalent
> (60, 75, 115) for working frame size and frame rate.
>
> -Jeff
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/