Thanks for looking into this. Now that you mention it, I'm pretty sure
that I read somewhere that you're only given 2 levels above the master clip
to match back to. Sounds like something that should be improved upon...
Mostly so that I don't get any more editor shit storms about match frame
functions...
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:00 PM, johnrobmoore <bigfish@pacbell.net> wrote:
> **
>
>
> I checked with our lead AE and heres what he said, "Unfortunately, once
> you subclip from a multigroup, you can't matchback to the original group.
> Hope this helps."
>
> Sounds like sub clipping the multigroup add one too many layers of
> abstraction and loses the matchframe link back to the multigroup.
>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, namyrb <namyrb@...> wrote:
> >
> > If I hit match frame on the source monitor it goes to the subclip. Hit it
> > again and you get the master clip.
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:07 PM, johnrobmoore <bigfish@...> wrote:
> >
> > > **
>
> > >
> > >
> > > I've had a few quirks come up on 4.0.5 with sequences cut from multi
> > > groups. It was very rare but occasionally there were issues matching
> back.
> > > I'm onlining so I usually use the commit multicam function to
> eliminate the
> > > group clips and then the matchframes go to the decomposed master
> clips. I
> > > don't have a solution only that I have seen strangeness along those
> lines.
> > > What happens if you hit match on the source monitor?
> > >
> > > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "namrbius" <namyrb@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > We're currently working on MC 4.0.5 and are having problems matching
> > > back to Sub-groups.
> > > >
> > > > When pressing match frame on a clip in a sequence edited from a
> > > sub-group (created by the editor from a multigroup), the resulting
> > > match-frame is of one of the sub-groups Avid automatically creates
> when you
> > > generate the Multigroup and not the sub-group that was used to edit
> with.
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't the correct match-frame be that of the sub-group from
> which it
> > > was edited from? And if it isn't, wouldn't the next logical choice be
> to
> > > match back to the original multigroup? Why would it match back to group
> > > used to create a multigroup?
> > > >
> > > > Hope this makes sense.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment