Re: [Avid-L2] MC V6.0 Effects Editor NOW and ode to V.4

Which is really what Shirley said - click it off to mute it and Ctrl/Cmnd click it to solo it (they way we were . . . I feel a song coming on). Oh, hang on . . . the video monitor still works that way!

On 21 Apr 2012, at 16:45, Greg Huson wrote:

> Adding to the collective voice: the mute/solo thing is annoying. Side-by-side would be better, or a bigger, 'multipurpose' button (smart?) that mutes or solos depending on a modifier key.
>
> GH
>
> __________________________
> Greg Huson
> Chief
> Secret Headquarters, inc
> Greg (at) SecretHQ.Com
> www.SecretHQ.com
> www.DigitalServiceStation.com
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:38 AM, Shirley Gutierrez <guanacaa@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > I agree, Roger. And things started to get very wanky in the timeline with the addition of the Not-So-Smart-Tools. I particularly object to the pure design idiocy of the mute/solo buttons. I mean, come on! I once could everything I needed to do as far as muting or soloing tracks with the same number of clicks I need to execute now, except that before I was clicking on a button that was the full height of the track, and now I'm clicking on a button that's half the size of the track! I have to slow down, and really look and aim for this tiny thing, and half the time I miss and click off a sync lock, which I remain unaware of until I start getting sync disasters. This was just your basic rotten idea, and it's one of several that slow me down and reduce my productivity. And every time I slow down, someone is paying. Often it's me.
> >
> > Shirley
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roger <rogershuff@yahoo.co.uk>
> > To: Avid-L2 <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 8:49 am
> > Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] MC V6.0 Effects Editor
> >
> > David - you are now veering off target. We are your customers who buy your tools
> > and keep you in business. If a number of customers tell you that they preferred
> > the interface the way it was before or that improvements need to be made, you'd
> > better listen (and it seems you are) or the customers will head off elsewhere.
> > I've seen many changes since I began editing on Media Composer in 1992 and I
> > think my copy of MC4 (second time around) is the most customisable and pleasant
> > to work with. This is not to decry the many powerful features that have been
> > added since then but the user experience is important.
> >
> > On 20 Apr 2012, at 16:28, David Colantuoni wrote:
> >
> > > A few people have contacted me off list about this. This is about a unifying
> > look, not about functionality. Sorry if I was not clear on that. Each product
> > has its own identity and user experience and that's up to the individual product
> > teams to define. Avid made a commitment to unify its brand a few years back
> > (ie- Pinnacle Studio is now Avid Studio). UI came along for the ride. It's
> > about brand and brand awareness. Most large companies have a unified way for
> > their UI. It's an important element so customers identify with Avid products
> > through a visual and hopefully emotional connection.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > David Colantuoni
> > > Product Management - Professional Video Editors and Effects | P&S Creative
> > Professional
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: "Knut A. Helgeland" <knut@toxic.no<mailto:knut@toxic.no>>
> > > Reply-To: "Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>"
> > <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Date: Friday, April 20, 2012 9:43 AM
> > > To: "Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>"
> > <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] MC V6.0 Effects Editor
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 20. apr. 2012, at 03:52, David Colantuoni wrote:
> > >
> > >> We have a design team at Avid unifying all of the UI in all products to have
> > a similar look.
> > >
> > > My question then would be "why"? When it's obvious that a design
> > concept/paradigm is breaking with established user experiences, it's not a good
> > idea. All design concepts are not good design concepts, and often they're not
> > even design concepts, but initiated from foreign considerations like engineering
> > constraints, or economics, or 'taste'.
> > >
> > > PS Please do not inform this 'UI unifying design team' that Avid has a product
> > called DS.
> > >
> > > K
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > With best wishes,
> > Roger Shufflebottom
> > +44 7973 543 660
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

With best wishes,
Roger Shufflebottom
+44 7973 543 660

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/