Not to mention that is clearly stated in the delivery specs:
'
The
clock must appear round when viewed on a 16x9 screendisplay of the
same aspect ratio the programme is intended to be viewed on. E.g. The clock on a 4 x 3
programme must appear round on a 4 x 3 display. The clock on a 16 x 9
programme must appear round on a 16 x 9
display
'
cheers,
BG
www.finale.tv
--- On Wed, 3/14/12, David Ross <speckydave@gmail.com> wrote:
From: David Ross <speckydave@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Standards
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 4:24 AM
Actually, I'd say this is perfectly understandable. Checking the shape of a
circle is one way to determine whether aspect ratio is correct - especially
if the programme will potentially be ARC'ed later.
D.
Sent from my mobile. Please excuse the spelling.
On Mar 14, 2012 9:09 AM, "Dylan Reeve" <dylan@dylan.wibble.net> wrote:
>
> My favourite rejection so far was from the BBC - the countdown clock
wasn't
> round. They require a round clock.
>
> Those tapes were shipped back to New Zealand from the UK, a new ID board
> laid in and then returned to the BBC.
>
> Dylan Reeve
> http://dylanreeve.com/
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Dom Q. Silverio <domqsilverio@gmail.com
>wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > So a client master was rejected because "Your slate says fps: 29.97 but
> > your tape is 1080i/59.94"
> >
> > Seriously. Major cable broadcaster.
> >
> > Dom Q. Silverio
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:
http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Re: [Avid-L2] Standards
__._,_.___
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
.
__,_._,___
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment