Think again:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Cinema_Package
Bouke
VideoToolShed
van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS NIJMEGEN
The Netherlands
+31 24 3553311
www.videotoolshed.com
For large files:
http://dropbox.yousendit.com/BoukeVahl998172
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bogdan Grigoresco" <bogdan_grigorescu@yahoo.com>
To: <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: 29.97P conversion to 24/23.976
I think DCP standard is actually 24 and 48 only, so not really any extra
options for transcoding from 29.97.
cheers,
BG
www.finale.tv
--- On Wed, 3/14/12, bouke <bouke@editb.nl> wrote:
From: bouke <bouke@editb.nl>
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: 29.97P conversion to 24/23.976
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 8:40 AM
From my head: 23.976, 24, 25, 29.97, 48
But perhaps even more...
Bouke
VideoToolShed
van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS NIJMEGEN
The Netherlands
+31 24 3553311
www.videotoolshed.com
For large files:
http://dropbox.yousendit.com/BoukeVahl998172
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bogdan Grigoresco" <bogdan_grigorescu@yahoo.com>
To: <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: 29.97P conversion to 24/23.976
'For digital projection, DCP supports other framerates, so there is no need
to make it 24 '
And what other framerates would these be? Just curious...
cheers,
BG
www.finale.tv
--- On Wed, 3/14/12, bouke <bouke@editb.nl> wrote:
From: bouke <bouke@editb.nl>
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: 29.97P conversion to 24/23.976
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 5:04 AM
Well, it it's for the theatre, it must be printed to 35mm if there is
a need
to be 24.
(For digital projection, DCP supports other framerates, so there is no need
to make it 24 (unless you want to take money from your client of course).)
But if there is budget to get it on 35mm, there is also budget for other
things.
In that case, I'm with Mark, get the animators to re-render at 24
progressive, and re-edit if needed.
(If sot, let them re-render at 25 interlaced also, no big deal while they're
at it...)
Bouke
VideoToolShed
van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS NIJMEGEN
The Netherlands
+31 24 3553311
www.videotoolshed.com
For large files:
http://dropbox.yousendit.com/BoukeVahl998172
----- Original Message -----
From: "johnrobmoore" <bigfish@pacbell.net>
To: <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:48 AM
Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: 29.97P conversion to 24/23.976
You make a good point. This is intended for theatrical distribution and
maybe that's where the 24 comes in. I was told it was a requirement for the
international delivery. I'll point out the 25 conversion for the "Normal"
part of the world and I'm sure that will make them feel better. ;-)
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "bouke" <bouke@...> wrote:
>
> this makes no sense. 24 is not intended for the international world if you
> already have 30.
> So you should be doing a standards conversion to 25 for the normal part
> of
> the world.
>
> Bouke
>
> VideoToolShed
> van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
> 6512 AS NIJMEGEN
> The Netherlands
> +31 24 3553311
> www.videotoolshed.com
> For large files:
> http://dropbox.yousendit.com/BoukeVahl998172
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Moore" <bigfish@...>
> To: "Avid L2" <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:04 PM
> Subject: [Avid-L2] 29.97P conversion to 24/23.976
>
>
> We have a CG show that all the animation was done 29.97P. They want to
> convert to 24 for international distribution. They've tried a Terenex in
> "auto" mode and "film" mode. The film mode is crisper but stutters. The
> auto
> mode is more fluid but on many shots there is something akin to what
> fluidmotion does sometimes in Avid with a distorted image. They are going
> to
> test a few more devices like an Alchemist and something else I can't
> remember the name. The issue is the original being 29.97P and not 23.976
> with pulldown added. Curious what others have done or think might be the
> proper device/mode to try. I'm thinking 29.97P would be easier to convert
> the 29.97I/59.94I but I'm not really sure if that's true. Hind sight is
> always great in these situations.
>
> John Moore
>
> Barking Trout Productions
>
> Studio City, CA
>
> bigfish@...
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No comments:
Post a Comment