The difference between square pixels and 601 pixels is .9 right? The math (720x.9) works out to slighly more than 640. And 480 is a little shy of 486.
Avid used to claim 640x 480 was broadcast SD, but it's really 720x486. With 720x480 being DV and DVD.
So it's CLOSE to SD, but I say it's NOT SD. The bigger question is WHY shoot 4:3 SD when you have a 16:9 camera? For the artful look of the square? :-)
Steve Hullfish
contributor: www.provideocoalition.com
author: "The Art and Technique of Digital Color Correction"
On Jan 25, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Terence Curren wrote:
>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Steve Hullfish <steve4lists@...> wrote:
>
> <<it has a 640x480 setting. So that's actually LESS than SD.>>
>
> Not actually. If it's square pixels that is SD.
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment