Dear all,
I agree with Bouke and FYI in France on next Monday: all TV chanels "must" reach -23 dB LUFS on a 24H measure with dedicated R128 metering. Next step in France: 01/01/2012 with more specifications to respect.
Regrds
Cédric
Le 16 déc. 2011 à 10:09, "bouke" <bouke@editb.nl> a écrit :
> Mark,
> You totally missed the point.
> There will be no brickwall involved anymore if you deliver up to specs. And
> the beaty is, you don't need any compression to stand up to the competition.
> The loudness idea is about perceived loudness, so there is not anything you
> can do to be 'louder' than the others.
> IOW, you can use a dramatic dynamic range (people are not really sensitive
> for short peaks, so they don't count very much), and it will be broadcasted
> exactly as you made it.
>
> Bouke
>
> VideoToolShed
> van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
> 6512 AS NIJMEGEN
> The Netherlands
> +31 24 3553311
> www.videotoolshed.com
> For large files:
> http://dropbox.yousendit.com/BoukeVahl998172
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Spano" <cutandcover@gmail.com>
> To: <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 10:31 PM
> Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: Anyone made a GXF (SMPTE RDD 14-2007) file?
>
> You would think, but when that started happening in analog world, we all
> freaked out when we saw and heard what the networks did to our spots...
>
> I've been spearheading making sure all of my mixers get a head start at
> compliance with the ITU spec. If they can hit the spec, then they'll start
> to figure out how to get the best sounding stuff through the broadcasters'
> <whatever the new version of brickwall limiter is>.
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "blafarm" <blafarm@...> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the links.
> >
> > And, this crossed my path last night:
> > http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/13/us/fcc-loud-commercials/index.html
> >
> > Seems the burden of equalizing levels in the US is more on the
> > broadcasters -- than the spot producers.
> >
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Spano" <cutandcover@> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's been all anyone in broadcasting (and Congress) can talk about for
> > > the past couple of years. CALM Act, ITU-R BS.1770, -24 LKFS +/-2, etc.
> > >
> > > Couple of links:
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_Advertisement_Loudness_Mitigation_Act
> > >
> > > http://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-BS.1770-0-200607-S/en
> > >
> > > http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/consumerawareness/a/When-And-How-The-Calm-Act-Will-Be-Enforced.htm
> > >
> > > http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/13/us-fcc-idUSTRE7BC27R20111213
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "blafarm" <blafarm@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Not sure what the EBU does over there, but over here the loudness
> > > > >specs are final. http://tech.ebu.ch/loudness
> > > >
> > > > Curious ... I've not heard of any pending initiative like this
> > > > proposed for the States. Anyone else?
> >
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No comments:
Post a Comment