I'd say to not be a slave to any one element. Don't make picture & sound be a slave to music, but cut the music to meet your needs as you would anything else. Vary everything, if you truly want to speak the language.
(And split an infinitive any damn time you like.)
--
Jeff Cook
jeff@cookstudios.com
703-980-1104 (cell)
CookStudios.com
Freelance Video Editing
Washington DC & Portable
On Oct 31, 2011, at 5:00 PM, George Loch <george@motoxpress.com> wrote:
> I find that patterns are part of how we communicate in art (not to pull
> THAT discussion into this). It's a great way to setup action and
> expectations. Montage sequences are more likely as candidates for this.
>
> -gl
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Job ter Burg (L2B) <Job_L2@terburg.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> No.
>>
>> I don't know how and why you would count. Would you count shot lengths,
>> basically measuring cuts? Most rhythmical editing - to me - is about the
>> flow of what is happening _inside_ the frame, more so than about the actual
>> picture change.
>>
>> I sometimes find I'm sort of counting, but more like when dancing, mostly
>> to a 'beat' within the shot/scene.
>>
>> On 29 okt. 2011, at 00:52, George Loch wrote:
>>
>>> Do any of you find that you tend to edit in numerical patterns?
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:
>> http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment