5 generations sounds like the number I've seen bantered around but I've never dealt with it first hand. It's a moot point now I'm going to output to SR and we will keep that master in house for future re purposing. Since it's a comedy special I figure the lack of generation loss will make it even funnier. I've always felt bandwidth and comic impact are directly proportional. ;-)
I suppose I could always dub it to digibeta and avoid all generation loss (inside joke from a past life.)
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Terence Curren" <tcurren@...> wrote:
>
>
> Try that again... You'll never seen the generation loss of 5 passes on HDCAM once the video has ben mangled through the whole distribution process. And certainly not when viewing off the internet.... or on your iPhone... etc.
>
>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Terence Curren" <tcurren@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I've seen detectable noise in 5 generations. On the other hand you'll never
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, John Moore <bigfish@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I know HDCam doesn't hold up well for multiple generations hence the SR format for better dubbing and extra audio channels. I've got a show shot on HDCam that will be closed captioned adding an extra generation. I prefer to output the edit master to HDCamSr and send that off as the source for the closed captioning dub to HDCam. Just curious if I'm being to anal about this. Anybody got any opinion on 3rd generation HDCam which would be the air master if I output to HDCam for the edit master before captioning?
> > >
> > > John Moore
> > >
> > > Barking Trout Productions
> > >
> > > Studio City, CA
> > >
> > > bigfish@
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
[Avid-L2] Re: HDCam 3rd generation dub?
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment