>
>
>Definitely edit in HD, then go SD at the end. I was wondering about
>the blowup, and did a little test. If you add a blowup in a 1080p
>project and render it, then switch the format to NTSC 23.98, the
>quality is noticeably better than if you switch it to NTSC and view
>it real time. It seems that any effect will be applied after the
>media is downconverted.
>
>So edit in HD and make sure you render everything before you make
>the SD output so that all the effects are generated in an HD
>resolution.
Thanks all. I ran your feedback to the facility. The
sales/scheduling person seemed to think that SD Adrenaline
effectively downconverts during ingest, that's no good.
In my limited experience (on my MC 2.7 which handles HD but does't
monitor HD) I can ingest HD after setting the Proj setting to HD.
Then if I wanted to be able to monitor SD video, I'd have to switch
the proj to SD. In this workflow is that I have not "stepped-on" the
HD footage and compromised it's quality. I can always switch back to
HD and export a Quicktime where my blow-ups will look fine once the
Qt has been downconverted to NTSC.
Paul
Friday, December 3, 2010
RE: [Avid-L2] shooting HD for a SD deliverable & facility cost
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment