This is why I often subsequence my rendered track and in bin display show rendered effects then I can delete the media and save disk space.
---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <Ben@ContactBen.com> wrote :
On Jun 3, 2016, at 8:29 AM, tcurren@aol.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
It depends upon your resolution. If you are using a lossy codec, then each new render is using the new media from the render below. So you could be going down 5 generations with 5 layers of effects for example. The higher resolutions in Avid shouldn't be an issue in this case.As for unrender, you can select a section of timeline via in & out marks, right click and there is an option delete renders within that range.
---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <CraigACM@...> wrote :As a "best practice" for maintaining quality, is it better to have one upper track that renders all the effects below it in one operation, or to have tracks with individual renders stacked on top of one another? While editing, I frequently have to render effects in the timeline to get them to play smoothly. And as titles, color correction, noise reduction, and other finishing touches are added in later stages of editing, I wind up with multiple renders stacked on top of each other. And then, in final preparation for a Same As Source export, I'll add a top track with the Safe Limiter Effect and do a video mixdown.
So my question is, would it be better – or the same quality – if I un-rendered all those lower tracks and had the video mixdown perform all the necessary rendering in one pass?
And, in a related question, is there any way to quickly "un-render" a specific effect without going into effect editor and changing a parameter, or using Media Tool to delete all the pre-computes in a sequence? I've noticed that changing color correction on a clip frequently does not un-render a title effect above it – causing color to shift when the title comes in. Is there a fast way to un-render that title or any other specific effect that has already been rendered, without changing it?
Thanks, all.
Craig Mikhitarian
Posted by: bigfish@pacbell.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (4) |
No comments:
Post a Comment