It's the worst approach of the three. It WILL introduce artefacts which '24
at 25' or '25 at 24' won't.
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
namyrb
Sent: 06 December 2012 11:17
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Once More Into the (Frame Rate) Breach
If you have access to hardware cross-conversion, then option B sounds good
to me.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Terence Curren <tcurren@aol.com> wrote:
> **
>
>
> You really have two options.
>
> Option A is the sped up PAL approach. This is the "run 24 at 25" and
> adjust the pitch on the audio so no one knows it been sped uo.
>
> Option B is you use a method that maintains the same run length by
> futzing with the frames to create new frames that may look good or not
> depending upon your level of critique and access to a still store to
> actually see what each frame looks like. Teranex will give you option
> B. And it will play smooth for the most part.
>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, David Dodson <davidadodson@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I've asked this question here before, but as now I'm getting close
> > to
> rolling, I want to ask again in case opinions have evolved and/or
mutated...
> >
> > I'm directing (and cutting) a feature film and an eight-episode TV
> series that are shooting simultaneously on the Alexa. The TV show is
> an expanded version of the movie, but that's not important. What is
> important is that the TV show is for the PAL market. But of course the
> feature theatrical distribution will happen at 24fps, because this is
> a wide, mainstream movie that's going into a whole bunch of theaters.
> >
> > Scenes from the TV show will be in the movie. Scenes from the movie
> > will
> be in the TV show. So there's no way to say, "Oh, well, we'll just
> shoot movie scenes at 24fps and TV scenes in 25 fps!" because, as I
> said, it's one big orgy. So we have to choose a base frame rate and
> let one side of this party adjust to the other.
> >
> > I'm leaning towards shooting everything at 24fps since it's the big
> screen feature image that will undergo the most visual scrutiny in
> large, unforgiving venues. The TV episodes will be most often viewed
> in SD, some HD, but still -- TV screens at home. Does this reasoning
> hold up? I would love people's thoughts on this.
> >
> > And then of course, what about 23.98 vs. 24? Some post will be done
> > in
> Los Angeles. But other post will be in Moscow. So, you know... kill me
now.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > David Dodson
> > davidadodson@...
> >
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:
http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (6) |
No comments:
Post a Comment