Dear colleague,
Thank you for your message. Kindly note that I am out of office from 12 July till 07 August 2015, both days inclusive. During my absence please coordinate with Mr. Karim Dhib KDhib@jcctv.net (Tel: 55169204 ) for the issues related to Post Production and Mr. Wessam Abdellatif WAbdellatif@jcctv.net (Tel: 66598775 ) for the issues related to Acquisitions.
I will not be able to check my e-mails regularly but please keep me CC in all correspondence.
Best regards,
On Jul 12, 2015, at 15:56, oliverpeters@oliverpeters.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> First of all, Log-C and Canon-Log are two different gamma curves. Log-C is only ARRI and is derived from film scan profiles. Canon-Log isn't quite as flat-looking as Log-C. The second issue is what was the DP's exposure index? If the image was exposed at the settings that are optimal for Canon Log, then you should be closer than what you describe. Have you tried other LUTs to see if this is an Avid issue or camera issue? For example, applying a Canon-Log LUT in Resolve or FCP X and see if the image reacts that same way as in Media Composer.
>
> - Oliver
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: Walid Ketata <walidketata@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (10) |
No comments:
Post a Comment