Jim,
Thanks for the info. I'm going to take a look at the M40 and M41.
There's a good chance this will fill the bill. If it's set up then all they
have to do is turn it on and hit record.
The cards look easy to get out. I'll get a spare set and we can shuttle
them back and forth.
I'll let you know how it works out.
Alan
Alan Miller
48 Hours Mystery
CBS News
From: Jim Feeley <jfeeley@gmail.com>
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2011 2:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] HD Camcorder
Alan,
I'm on a similar quest. We need a half-dozen simple cameras for
subjects with minimal experience to keep with them for the inevitable
(but unpredictable) day When The Heavy S*** Comes Down, Man. Our needs
differ from yours, but here's what I think:
I end up working with DSLRs a lot, as do we all. A DSLR as Greg
suggests could be a good way to go if you you think the operator can
pull it off, if he/she will largely be working on sticks, if they'll
largely be getting scenics of beautiful piazzas or something, and if
you want to spend the money. I'd say the cheapest decent way to go
would be a Canon Rebel T2i with the crappy kit lens or with the decent
Tamron 17-50 2.8 lens (that I like and use). That would cost $1100ish.
Or maybe the $1000ish kit with the 18-135 lens would be OK (haven't
used that lens). But the Rebel T3i body has a flip-out LCD screen that
really really eases using a DSLR... worth the extra $100 or so, imo.
Do you care about audio? Spend some more money 'cause the built-in
DSLR mics suck. You'll still have a DSLR, and all the inherent
niceness and ickiness that goes with...
But if they'll be shooting handheld, don't have decent skills, will
not have time to do lots of fiddling with the camera, then maybe you
want to consider a small palmcorder. That's the direction we're going.
I've been reviewing a few of these. Currently, I'm pretty impressed
with some of the newer Canon camcorders. I evaluated the $700ish Canon
HF M40 and the $1500ish HF G10. They're largely similar, but for the
lens and a couple other features (G10 has bigger LCD screen, true 24p
progressive rather than 24F-on-60i, easier access to some settings,
better--but not great--zoom control)...there are several variants of
the M40... one has a viewfinder in addition to the LCD screen; a
couple have different memory configurations. But the M cameras seem
otherwise the same.
The coolest thing about these particular Canon cameras: Instead of
tiny 8-megapixel sensors, they have tiny (1/3-inch) 2 megapixel
sensors... specifically 1920x1080 sensors. So each pixel site is
somewhat bigger. So the cameras work better in low light and show
noticeably more (but not fantastic) dynamic range than other small
camcorders. Really, the image looks pretty good (for AVCHD from a
small camera). The built-in mics are a bit bright, but OK. The built-
in wind filter isn't great. But the cameras have 3.5mm headphone and
mic jacks... that's nice though we won't be taking advantage of
those...KISS. The G10 lens opens to 30mm vs 45mm (35mm still
equivalent) for the M40... that's significant. And the G10 lens is a
bit faster.
Here, this link should lead you to a comparison chart:
http://bit.ly/nvjwfq
If that doesn't work, go here:
http://usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/camcorders/consumer_camcorders
Both cameras have decent Auto modes (some with auto white balance;
sigh), and enough manual control. I could go on, but it's the sensor
and low-light performance that's making these cameras good options for
us. The cameras have a lot of options. Will your operator want to use
the auto white balance even if you say don't? Will they choose the
best image stabilization for their particular use? Do you want them
recording at 60i or what? You might want to consider getting the
camera in house, setting them up the way you want, then sending them
to Italy. FWIW, we'll probably end up choosing one of the M-series
cameras, mainly for budget reasons... if I was buying a small
camcorder for myself, I'd probably buy the G10.
Also, you might want to consider getting a simple offloading app such
as ShotPut Pro (for Mac or Windows):
http://www.imagineproducts.com/
Makes it pretty easy to simultaneously copy cards to a couple hard
drives, verify the copy, and so on. I could see you wanting the
operator to copy media to two hard drives, ship you the memory cards
and one hard drive, and hold onto the second hard drive as security.
Some people don't seem to like ShotPut Pro, but we've found it to be
simple (as in both PAs and producers can do the work) and reliable...
Would love to hear what others think
Regardless what camera you end up choosing, it's imperative that your
EP send you to Italy for a couple weeks of location scouting.
Well that's enough from me. I'm getting sleepy.
Would love to hear what others think.
HTH a little,
Jim Feeley
jfeeley@gmail.com
On Aug 4, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Alan Miller wrote:
>
> Can anyone recommend an HD camcorder that can be shot by a semi
> professional operator.
> I need to have them shoot in Italy and then be able to get the
> footage back to NY for ingest into
> Avid. I assume the only way to do this is with flash cards that can
> then be sent back or transferred
> to a drive. Or shoot on a hard hard drive and copy that to a drive.
> I'm trying to make this simple for
> the operator.
> Any ideas? I'm trying to keep the price under $1000.
> Alan Miller
>
> Alan Miller
> 48 Hours Mystery
> CBS News
>
------------------------------------
Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment