Does AMA support alpha?
Not near a machine to test.
But since you mentioned graphics via after effects...
C. A. Magid
RTVF
On May 19, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Greg Huson <Greg@SecretHQ.com> wrote:
> Frank was discussing that at editors lounge last week. Yes, that's what he said, too. Newer code. However, today, I test that theory going from h.264 to 2:1 SD, and did not have the 'faster' experience. That's just one case, though- usually it does go much faster to transcode from AMA than to import. And, in fact, some things I don't even bother to transcode- for example, if you render out of after effects to an avid QuickTime codec- AMA saves the time of even a 'fast import,' with no performance hit I can see.
>
> Greg (at) secrethq.com
> Greg Huson
> Secret Headquarters, Inc
> www.DigitalServiceStation.com
> www.SecretHQ.com
> iPhone
>
> On May 19, 2011, at 2:41 PM, "loso007" <loso007@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > AMA is not only faster, but much faster for me. I suppose AMA is using all the CPU power the box has, where as the traditional import just uses one. Can anyone confirm this??
> >
> > Loren
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Lou Wirth <loutv@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Which is faster? AMA link and transcode QT or import?
> > > I know I could do a test but I'm in the middle of a long import. ;-)
> > > Lou
> > > Lou Wirth Productions
> > > 500Tamal Plaza, Suite 522
> > > Corte Madera, CA 94925
> > > www.louwirth.com
> > > 415-924-9411p
> > >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment