Dear colleague,
Thank you for your message. Kindly note that I am out of office from 12 July till 07 August 2015, both days inclusive. During my absence please coordinate with Mr. Karim Dhib KDhib@jcctv.net (Tel: 55169204 ) for the issues related to Post Production and Mr. Wessam Abdellatif WAbdellatif@jcctv.net (Tel: 66598775 ) for the issues related to Acquisitions.
I will not be able to check my e-mails regularly but please keep me CC in all correspondence.
Best regards,
On Jul 13, 2015, at 04:22, bigfish@pacbell.net [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> ---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <oliverpeters@...> wrote :
> Canon is written Canon, not Cannon.
>
> Oliver you must not be using the proper spelling LUT to read my posts. It clearly reads Cannon on my screen, the fact that you are seeing "Cannnon" means you are not balanced for the my IN BAY SPELLING LUT. It looks fine to the crew here. Not only is the spelling correct the color on Cannon is perfect and should need no correction in post. I could send you my IN BAY SPELLING LUT but you will probably have better luck just spelling from scratch.
>
> Once my spelling LUT is standardized it will make spell check obsolete. We all know the way we've been spelling for all these years needs to be revamped regardless of all the infrastructure in place.
>
>
>
> ---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <oliverpeters@...> wrote :
>
> Canon is written Canon, not Cannon. The EI is basically what you "rate" the optimal exposure of the sensor to be, analogous to film being rated as 25 or 250 or 500, etc. In digital cameras this determines where the signal falls within the dynamic range of the sensor. Think of it as the equivalent of creating a "dense negative" in the film world.
>
> Where this affects production and post is how this informs lighting decisions. Let's say it is a"250" camera and you set it to be 1000. Now you are "seeing" deeper into the blacks. Therefore, there may be a tendency to under-light the scene, because you can "see" everything. But in reality, what you see is noisy, which you discover in post. OTOH, if you run it at 250, then you really have to add a lot of light to get to see what you want to see in the scene.
>
> - Oliver
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: Walid Ketata <walidketata@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (15) |
No comments:
Post a Comment