Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Searching for wisdom on two fronts

 

Thanks Tim et al. This is awesome advice. I will pass on to my client

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 22, 2015, at 1:45 AM, Tim Mangini tim_mangini@wgbh.org [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

In our testing (a few years old now) Teranex was marginally superior at scaling to Snell’s Alchemist, but no-one has ever come close to the Ph C for motion compensated frame rate conversion.  Software has caught up in most of these areas.  If realtime hardware based throughput is required then it becomes a matter of need versus cost.  If frame rates are not changing, the Teranex provides better bang for the buck.  If there is a lot of pull-down I your workflow, the exponential cost of S&W Alchemist becomes part of the equation.

tim

__._,_.___
Posted by: Steve Hullfish <steve@veralith.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (7)
this is the Avid-L2

.

__,_._,___
at

No comments:

Post a Comment