Thanks for reminding me. I was just trying to understand better what the issue with Resolve round tripping and having psf and interlace files separated for export. I concur that electronically it doesn't differ electronically whether its fields or psf's making up the video essence. The only important thing is field order. That's where I'm curious what deleterious effect there is to rendering out of Resolve media that is psf to interlace. Perhaps I need to reread and I mistook psf for progressive media. Progressive media in Avid has traditionally been psf under the hood if I'm not mistaken. At least in my predominantly 59.94i delivery world it is when dealing with progressive material to tape and HDSDI world. So I guess the real question is what is it about interlace vs a true progressive file rendered out of Resolve to avid mxf that makes it necessary to separate the two types of media render out in different passes. I get that Resolve can't export both types at the same time but what is it in Avid that would make the round tripping a problem if progressive got baked out as interlace. I don't generally deal with much 23.98 so I'm probably missing something obvious.
---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <cutandcover@...> wrote :
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 7:37 PM, <bigfish@...> wrote:You mentioned having to separate out interlace vs. progressive. What is the issue if psf media gets rendered out as interlace? Electrically they are the same just the temporal difference between the fields. Avid has no issue Ive come across mixing them. Does it create a relink issue when coming back to Avid. IIRC in avid I can change the motion type of clips in the bin and the media still works.
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (6) |
No comments:
Post a Comment