The issue with the cloud is compounded in places with hefty data caps or intermittent web (eg Bangkok).
It's great that it's coming i like the idea but in reality didn't media composer just triple in cost? I don't care personally I think it was all getting too cheap to be sustainable but resolve is free and CC is so massive.
I'll reserve judgement until I see the new features. 4k is vital as is resolution independent timeline if avid is to stay in the game. Offline quality cloud based compression works in some scenarios but not in tvc land anymore.
Mike
> On 7 Apr, 2014, at 3:49 am, "Dom Q. Silverio" <domqsilverio@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I agree. Cloud editing has some logistic problems considering 10 Mb/s
> UPLOAD is considered fast for consumer internet here in the US.
>
>
>
>> On 4/6/2014 4:29 PM, Jeff Kreines wrote:
>> How exactly will the Cloud let me remotely work with large amounts of high-res, uncompressed footage?
>>
>> Is one only working with proxy files on the Cloud?
>>
>> What about uploading footage to the Cloud? Whenever I upload large files to Dropbox, it takes forever. I don't have the fastest connection, while I can get (at extra cost) downloads as fast as 60 megabits/second, upload tops out at 5 megabits per second.
>>
>> Right now, I just Fedex hard drives and copy them to my local RAID. Sometimes — and this is clunky — I do things via TeamViewer — I choose files, trim them, render them out — remotely — but if I need to do real work, I need the real files.
>>
>> If there were a way to access my big server in NYC remotely from Alabama at fast speeds (like 10 GigE speeds) sign me up!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeff Kreines
>> Kinetta
>> jeff@kinetta.com
>> kinetta.com
>> kinettaarchival.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo Groups Links
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo Groups Links
>
>
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (32) |
No comments:
Post a Comment