Oh and the reason why your clips reverted when transcoded is because that is a bug not solved until v7. This bug also affects Reformat, so if you AMA link, change Reformat, and transcode, it reverts to Stretch every time. Thankfully both of these things are much better handled in v7, but it was a long time where these bugs lived and wreaked havoc.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Mark Spano <cutandcover@gmail.com> wrote:
Field Motion bin column.In order for the clips to have the proper motion adapter applied, they must be properly recognized by MC as PROGRESSIVE. 5D clips almost always come in as UNKNOWN. You must change this value for each clip (and until MC v7, one by one yay!), then cut them into a sequence and the pulldown will be correct. No promoting necessary.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:49 PM, John Moore <bigfish@pacbell.net> wrote:
The AEs had converted some Canon 5D from 23.98 to 59.94 on mc 6.5.3 but I was getting blended interpolated frames. I went back to the Up Rez project and linked ama to the 23.98 clips and cut them into the final 59.94 1080i sequence. I then promoted the motion adapters to progressive input and 2:3 Film Output. I could step through the fields and see perfect 2:3 cadence but when taking the sequence with these shots and transcoding/Converting the clips get back to the blended frame problem. I finally did a mixdown and that worked but I must be missing some option setting here. If I render the sequence the clips retain proper cadence it's when transcoding/convert that they seem to revert to the blended interpolate. I looked in render settings and media creations but nothing jumped out as a setting that would influence the transcoded conversion clips to be blended interpolate or any of the other settings. Am I missing something obvious. Seems weird that I can have a perfect cadence of the clips in the sequence but they become blended frames during Transcode/Convert.
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (2) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment