That makes much more sense. Thanks.
T :)
From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Wilson Chao
Sent: 09 January 2014 17:17
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Fw: New SEC Document(s) for Avid Technology, Inc.
I interpreted that to mean that the results of Avid's re-evaluation would be revisions to their balance sheet reflecting a loss of $25m - $34m.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Tony Quinsee-Jover <tony@hdheaven.co.uk> wrote:
Ahhh… thanks, Stuart :)
$25m to $34m just to re-evaluate? Geez.
T.
From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Lawn
Sent: 09 January 2014 16:53
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Fw: New SEC Document(s) for Avid Technology, Inc.
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (10) |
No comments:
Post a Comment