How are you going to convince Mr Joe Public that 'better pixels' is worth
him spending money on? More pixels is an easy argument.
If we forget the public, and simply assume that they can receive these
'better pixels' with their current kit, then how are you going to convince
broadcasters to invest in 'better pixels' for zero ROI?
We can all have ideals, but ideals don't generate income for anyone, which
is why they are so rarely met.
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
David Dodson
Sent: 06 November 2013 14:28
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Avid-L2] Better vs. More
Dammit, Terry, do I have to do all your work for you?
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/behind-screen/why-4k-might-not-be-636485
Seriously, though. Up with better. Down with more.
David D
David Dodson
davidadodson@sbcglobal.net
------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (2) |
No comments:
Post a Comment