My biggest issue with tapeless delivery is you cannot "insert edit" fixes. Say you misspelled someone's lower third, or you spot a glitch. You can't simply insert a fix, cut to cut. You have to re-output the entire file again.
Barring that, I love it. Cheaper by far (no $300-$400 tapes and you needing to deliver 4-6 tapes...and then the deck ownership, or even rental)...simply deliver your files on a $100 USB drive.
---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <wilsonchao@gmail.com> wrote:
Barring that, I love it. Cheaper by far (no $300-$400 tapes and you needing to deliver 4-6 tapes...and then the deck ownership, or even rental)...simply deliver your files on a $100 USB drive.
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:53 AM, "jeffsengpiehl@yahoo.com" <jeffsengpiehl@yahoo.com> wrote:
But also to people who've no clue on how to get a file to pass network QC. A broader market is possible, a stupider one however won't make the grade. You always get what you pay for.
---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <wilsonchao@gmail.com> wrote:
HD tape I/O required a $25,000 deck connected to a $5,000 Mac running a free/pirated application. By eliminating that expensive gear, the market for HD post was opened to a wider market.
On Oct 16, 2013 9:06 AM, "Tony Quinsee-Jover" <tony@hdheaven.co.uk> wrote:On 16/10/2013 05:57, tcurren@aol.com wrote:
> And tape output is bad because....?
... because it was easy and reliable, silly.
Outputting now is so much more... adventuresome.
T.
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (15) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment