This IS the Avid L2: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Avid Pan & Zoom

Frustrating to be sure that MC is missing a variety of tools one would expect to see in the "leading NLE."
I'm not convinced that relying on 3rd party solutions is the complete answer.
Anyway . . . If you have BCC Pan & Zoom it has a lot of features, including rotation.
There is also a way to use Marquee to Pan & Zoom stills, but I have never done it, so I can't comment on it.

B

----
Benjamin Hershleder
Book: http://tinyurl.com/avidmc-book
Site: http://ContactBen.com

On Aug 21, 2013, at 10:08 AM, ksirul wrote:

> Awesome! Avid used to have a system that let you link to hi res stills with rotation or any type of DVE move for that matter as well as linking to hi res footage with any type of DVE move. Great to see them moving forwards with features.
>
> KEN
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Roger Shufflebottom <rogershuff@...> wrote:
> >
> > No rotation in Frameflex.
> > Â
> > With Best Wishes,
> > Roger Shufflebottom
> > +44 7973 543 660
> >
> >
> >
> > >________________________________
> > > From: ksirul <kenavid2@...>
> > >To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
> > >Sent: Wednesday, 21 August 2013, 16:50
> > >Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: Avid Pan & Zoom - can't make linear path work
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Â
> > >No Rotation....nuff said. This is a PROFESSIONAL tool. No rotation? With Frame Flex on 4 or 5 k footage, is there a way to rotate that footage or is that also locked to X and Y movement as well?
> > >
> > >KEN
> > >
> > >--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, John Pale <pale.edit@> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> If you have MC7, using Frame Flex you can keyframe large stills, linked
> > >> via AMA quite nicely. No rotations, but pans and zooms work well. No
> > >> third party plug needed.
> > >>
> > >> On Tuesday, August 20, 2013, Scott wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > **
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Really Mike? Care to clarify? Hmmmm?
> > >> >
> > >> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> > >> > 'Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com');>, "Mikeparsons.tv" <mikeparsons.tv@>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Actually no all the good illusion stuff was incorporated into DS so...
> > >> > Hmm ignore that...
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 20 Aug, 2013, at 7:38 PM, "Scott" <switthaus@> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > <sarcasm filter on>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > What? Say it ain't so! You mean Avid had their hands on a really
> > >> > powerful system but decided to let it die so their own, less capable
> > >> > products look better? No friggin' way. That's just folly! Avid would never
> > >> > be that dim....
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > <sarcasm filter off>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > ;-)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> > >> > 'Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com');>, Jay Mahavier <jay_mahavier@> wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I really liked Illusion. I didn't get to use it for long, but I had
> > >> > hopes for it. Same for AudioVision.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Jay
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Aug 19, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Terence Curren wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> > >> > 'Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com');>, "ksirul" <kenavid2@> wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > "It is ABSURD that we still need a 3rd party plug to do moves with
> > >> > large stills. Avid used to have a product that handled this perfectly, with
> > >> > the ability to mask and use with any other effect in a composite.....I
> > >> > forget what they called it."
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Illusion? (Sorry, couldn't resist)
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]