It can indeed shoot 29.97 progressive.
Cheers,
--Michael
On 12-01-24 10:37 PM, johnrobmoore wrote:
>
> This is SD footage to begin with. Not sure what switching the project
> format would accomplish. In QTX and QT 7 the frame size is 640x480 and
> in QT 7 the fps is 29.97 when in pause or play. The name of the file
> implies it's a 5D test. This seems to contradict the statement that
> the 5D can't do 29.97 but then I know QT 7 isn't always accurate in
> the fps parameter. The fact that Avid sees it as 29.97 and not 30
> seems like a more reliable indication it is in fact 29.97. Can anyone
> confirm if the 5D can in fact shoot a 29.97 frame rate?
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Anna Hovhannessian <annahovhannessian@...> wrote:
> >
> > Are you opening it in a 30i project?
> >
> > Go to Format tab and change project type.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 25, 2012, at 12:50 AM, John Moore <bigfish@...> wrote:
> >
> > > I've got some 29.97fps 4x3 SD footage shot with a Canon 5D. When I
> ama the clip the Avid bin says it's 29.97 fps in an 30I SD project.
> The footage plays fine but I'm curious when Avid displays 29.97 fps is
> that derived from metadata in the H.264 clip or is there something in
> the video essence itself that dictates the frame rate? I'm not having
> a problem but just trying to better understand the ama food chain. I'm
> on mcsoft V6 on a MBP. Also I don't notice any black lines at the top
> and bottom of the source monitor. I'm use to seeing a few black lines
> with 480 lines as opposed to 486 when I'm in a Symphony bay. Perhaps
> my smaller screen on the MBP makes it harder to see but I don't make
> any black lines out. Is this different in MC6 or am I just not
> noticing it on my laptop?
> > >
> > > John Moore
> > >
> > > Barking Trout Productions
> > >
> > > Studio City, CA
> > >
> > > bigfish@...
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No comments:
Post a Comment