Says more to me that there is a good editor(s) in the seat, no matter what box is in front of him (them). I'm in the "could care less" column. But I am sure Avid is not too happy about Apple taking away their "aspirations"....
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Shirley Gutierrez <guanacaa@...> wrote:
>
> Interesting. I can't remember where we were with the aspirational marketing argument. I think some members of the Avid L thought that having big time credits associated with a product made a difference, some thought new users could care less. What do you think?
>
>
> Best,
> Shirley
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver Peters <oliverpeters@...>
> To: avid-L2@yahoogroups.com; finalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, Feb 28, 2011 11:25 am
> Subject: [Avid-L2] Milestone
>
>
> In case no one noticed, FCP passed a milestone with the Oscars last night. "The
> Social Network" won for Best Editing. That makes it the first film cut on FCP to
> win a Best Editing Oscar. Congrats to Angus Wall and Kirk Baxter on the win.
> That seems to be a fitting match to Walter Murch's winning a best editing Oscar
> for the first electronically edited movie ("The English Patient", cut on Avid).
>
> - Oliver
>
> FWIW, some blog posts including interview with the folks involved.
>
> http://digitalfilms.wordpress.com/2010/10/02/the-social-network/
>
> http://digitalfilms.wordpress.com/2011/01/28/case-studies-in-film-editing/
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
No comments:
Post a Comment