I think the ability to start and stop while outputting would probably make it impossible to do it totally in real time. But if it felt like real time like a tape deck while outputting then did it's own thing to create the final file as a self contained unit that would be okay. Usually that output to tape is my final time to QC and watch for what might have been over looked in the final producer screening. I think a device like this that would work in an SDI environment would eliminate many of the various gamma and level shift issues we battle going between various file formats etc... Plus there is a very proven QC monitoring infrastructure to support the SDI side of the workflow. Oh I can dream can't I.
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Curtis Nichols <curtisnpcs@...> wrote:
>
> Ditto, John. I want a one hour show to require one hour of time to master - not
> two or three hours to run through Squeeze-type solutions.
>
>
> Curtis Nichols
> Señor Editor
> PCS Production Co.
> Irving, Tx.
> ------------------
> "Please call me if you don’t receive this email."
> ------------------
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: johnrobmoore <bigfish@...>
> To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Fri, December 17, 2010 4:07:01 PM
> Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: The "tape is dead" thread
>
> Then I want a file based deck. Something I can control from the edit bay, feed
> it an SDI signal and be able to pick up along the way if I catch an error. I
> haven't worked in an ISIS, Interplay environment but maybe some of this
> functionality is there. I'm under the impression you take a completed sequence
> and ship it of to the playback server thingy when done but it doesn't sound like
> you can watch it as it goes off to the server. I just don't like surprises but
> I guess I'll just have to go with the flow, work flow that is, when a file based
> delivery comes my way.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
No comments:
Post a Comment